Previous business/academic article Next business/academic article
General Antitrust

You Made a Pledge, Then Keep Your Promise: Article 9 Commitments Decisions in European Antitrust Law

Paul McGeown and Juliette Orologas, CPI Antitrust Chronicle March 2013.

See Paul McGeown's resume See Juliette Orologas's resume

Click here to read the full article online

Until the European Commission slapped a U.S. $730 million fine on Microsoft at the beginning of March 2013 for failing to comply with the "choice screen" commitment that it had made in 2009 to close the Internet Explorer case, part-time antitrust watchers could have been forgiven for believing that a European Article 9 decision was akin to a settlement. The result was, after all, a textbook "win-win." The Commission could close its file without needlessly expending scarce resources on the prosecution of an investigation; it could assert that it had corrected the perceived-though not proven-anticompetitive effects of certain behavior quickly through a tailored remedy; and it could repeat its claim to being a consumer-champion, all without undue fear of its decision being overruled in the courts. Back at corporate headquarters, meanwhile, the boards of the companies concerned could announce that they had spared the business a costly, drawn-out procedure-the outcome of which was unpredictable-and avoided a formal ruling that the company had infringed the competition rules; they could also be confident that for all practical purposes they had side-stepped costly follow-on damages actions before national courts.

© 2014 - Institute of Competition Law Download our brochure